Every health site says it is trustworthy. Here is the specific, checkable version — including the parts that argue against relying on us.
01 · This is a data pipeline, not a doctor
Everything here is aggregated automatically from public registries. No physician has reviewed these pages.
That is exactly why the site only reports counts and study descriptions instead of telling you whether something works. Reporting a fact is something software can do honestly. Making a medical judgment is not, and a site that pretended otherwise would be doing the thing it criticises.
02 · Nothing here tells you what to take
No dosing, no protocols, no stacks, no "best peptide for" anything. Not because we are being cagey — because that decision needs someone who knows your history, your medications and your bloodwork, and a website knows none of that.
Take what you find here to a clinician. The most useful thing this site can do is help you ask a better question.
03 · A registry is not the whole world
Some legitimate research never gets registered. Studies run outside the US and EU may not appear. Older work often predates registration requirements entirely.
A zero on this site means "nothing in the registries we track." That is meaningful and it is checkable, but it is not the same as "nothing exists anywhere," and we are careful never to write it that way.
04 · Nobody pays us, and that's the point
We sell no products, take no affiliate commissions, and accept no money from sellers, clinics or pharmacies. There is nothing to buy here and no link that earns us anything.
Search "most trusted source" for almost any peptide and every result is a vendor. That is the problem this site exists to sit outside of. If our funding ever changes, it will be disclosed at the top of every page before you read another word.
05 · You can check everything
Every trial on this site links to its original ClinicalTrials.gov record. Every number states what it counted and when it was checked. Every compound page shows several different ways of counting side by side.
This is deliberate. We would rather you checked us than trusted us, and a claim you cannot verify is worth very little regardless of who makes it.
Related
- Who runs this — the human behind the pipeline
- How we count — the exact rules
- Corrections — mistakes, published