How we count

We don't grade anything. We count registered human trials and report what they studied. Here are the exact rules, including what we leave out.

Most sites in this space will tell you a compound is "promising" or rate it out of five. That is an opinion wearing a lab coat. We do something narrower and more checkable: we report exactly what human research is registered, and what it was testing.

Where the numbers come from

What we count

Interventional human studies only. A study qualifies if it is registered, involves people, and gives them the compound.

Observational studies — which watch people who are already taking something — are listed separately and never counted toward the headline number. They cannot show that a compound causes an effect, and counting them would inflate every figure on this site.

Animal studies, cell studies, and published papers with no registry entry are not counted either. They may well exist and may well be interesting; they are just not what the number on the page measures.

What the number does and doesn't mean

A trial count measures how much has been formally studied in humans. It is not a verdict.

Why sources disagree

Search "how many human trials does BPC-157 have" and you will get several different answers from credible sources. None of them are lying — they are answering different questions, and most do not say which:

Each compound page publishes all of these side by side, so you can see that our headline figure is a choice with a stated rule rather than a number we preferred.

Judgment

None. There is no grade, tier, score or rating anywhere on this site, and there is no column for one in the database. Adding one would require a physician reviewer and would turn a fact-reporting operation into a medical opinion. We have chosen not to.

Corrections

Every page has a way to report an error, and corrections are published rather than quietly edited. Every trial links to its original registry record so you can recount it yourself in about a minute.

Related